Friday, January 27, 2012

If mainstream feminists aren't responsible for denouncing radical feminists, then who is?

Mainstream feminists expect people to grant them a "free pass" for sitting quietly by while the radicals behave in sexist and anti-male ways.



Only when the mainstream feminists are called out on the anti-male slants in feminism do they even care to comment about it.



It doesn't seem to bother them enough to think or speak about it at any other occasion.



The "radicals" don't wear "I'm a radical" T-shirts.



No, many of them call themselves "feminists."



How are people supposed to tell the difference?



So if mainstream feminists want to disassociate themselves from the radicals then they have to realize the half-hearted lip service the offer up when cornered doesn't work.



People know better.



Mainstream feminists need to make that an issue within feminism. Weeding out radical and anti-male feminists %26amp; making it crystal clear that they do not tolerate that behavior.



Feminists are quite motivated when they wish to do something and when they believe in something.



Makes one wonder.

If mainstream feminists aren't responsible for denouncing radical feminists, then who is?
Should anyone other than feminists be responsible for removing radicals in their own movement?



It is amazing how feminists expect men to do everything. If men had not endorsed, supported and done something, feminism would never have become big. If men don't continue to support feminism, it will fall. And now that feminism has gone too far, feminists turn to the same men they've been dissing, bashing and discriminating against for decades for help. The nerve.



Feminists in the west should be able to do at least this themselves. If feminists have the audacity to turn to men for help after what they have done to men, they had better be prepared for some colourful language and outright denial.
Reply:denouncing the radicals? this is the problem with discourses in our society .... we got nobody to blame and no body's responsible to anybody ... because every wo/man's position in this society is contextual .... so if the radicals hate men, then they may have all the reason to do so, if mainstream feminists [is there such?] wanted to weed them out then then let them be ..... bottom line ... whatever thought of feminism .... all they wanted is to have that elusive equality.
Reply:this labelling and grouping is absolutely arbitrary. There is no one in command and one doesnt need to follow-and on this forum neither achieves anything tangible- so it is just fictional
Reply:excess everywhere is bad. men as well as women shud strive for equal opportunities to men and women and bring about system where neither male nor female dominate but live by fully cooperating.
Reply:Everyone. You hear me? Everyone. You're in this, too. Don't wait for someone to speak up when you want to say the same thing.
Reply:Not all of us are working towards belittling a mans role, we are just trying to make ours better. I don't hate men I don't hate women. I DO NOT understand why we are so separate.



I want everyone to have a chance; to be given a go and be accounted for whether they fail or not. Not based on gender; but rather their credibility and skills.



I want man and woman; to come together and make life easier for everyone by taking down the dominant aggressive rulers of the sheeple. It is not a male versus female war we should be at. But rather a political struggle against those that would knowingly hold us down and blind us from the truth for their own personal gain.


No comments:

Post a Comment